Category: Cameras

  • Canon 80D vs Nikon D7200 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    Canon 80D vs Nikon D7200 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    Introduction

    Nikon and Canon are two of the longest-standing names in the photography and imaging industry, and it is with good reason. Both these brands have time and again been responsible for developing innovative technology as well as producing top tier high-quality cameras. With their product portfolio constantly increasing and evolving, it is no wonder that the fierce competition between these two companies is not about to die down anytime soon. The Canon 80D and the Nikon D7200 are perfect examples of these never-ending rivalry between the brands. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon EOS 80D[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] are semi-professional DSLR cameras introduced into the market in February 2016 and March 2015 in that order. In this article we discuss and compare various elements of the cameras to help you determine which one you should purchase.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon 80d Nikon d7200
    Resolution: 24.20 Megapixels 24.20 Megapixels
    Viewfinder: Optical / LCD Optical / LCD
    Kit Lens: 7.50x zoom 7.78x zoom
    Sensor size: (22.5mm x 15.0mm) (23.5mm x 15.6mm)
    Dimensions: 5.5 x 4.1 x 3.1 in. 5.3 x 4.2 x 3.0 in.
    Max Aperture: 3.5 (kit lens) 3.5 (kit lens)
    Shutter: 1/8000 – 30 sec 1/8000 – 30 sec
    Weight: 1.27 kg 1.256 kg
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Overview

    The Canon EOS 80D is a stunning mid-skill-level range camera that is ideal for enthusiasts or semi-skilled photographers who have outgrown their first compact/ entry-level DSLR camera. The camera brags a 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, inbuilt Wi-Fi capabilities, a 3-inch vari-angle touchscreen, extremely fast live view, shutter, and focus response. This camera performs exceptionally well and delivers stunning imagery whose quality is quite frankly unmatched. Its response time and speeds only add to the amazing crop frame DSLR in the form of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon 80D[/link].

    The Nikon D7200 takes up from its predecessor the Nikon D7000, and builds up on its set of features to produce top quality images regardless of the situation. The camera brags a 24.2 -megapixel APS-C sensor, a Nikon EXPEED 4-series image processor, 51-point AF sensor amongst other things. In comparison to its predecessor, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] has an impressive ISO range of between 100 and 102400, reduced image noise, inbuilt Wi-Fi capabilities, and a 6fps burst mode; users will be pleasantly surprised by the D7200.

    Canon 80D and Nikon D7200 – Specifications

    After looking at the general overview of each camera, we take a deep dive into the various specifications of each of the cameras to get a detailed understanding. The key specifications of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon 80D[/link] include; a 24.2-megapixel APS-C image sensor, 3-inch vari-angle LCD touchscreen, Dual Pixel autofocus system with 45 cross-type points, ISO range of 100 to 25600, 1080p Full HD at 60fps video capture capabilities as well as HDMI, USB 2.0 & Wi-Fi which make up the camera connectivity options.
    In contrast, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] consists of 24.2-megapixel APS-C, 3.2 LCD screen, 51-point autofocus system with 15 cross type, a wide ISO range of 100 to 102400, 1080p Full HD at 60fps video capture capabilities and the same connectivity options as the Canon EOS 80D.

    Specification Comparison

    We are aware that a bunch of specifications without a competitive comparison of how the specifications affect the performance and end result of the captured images is pointless. As such, to make the decision-making process simpler, here is a competitive comparison of the EOS 80D and D7200 when they are put to the test.

    Image quality: for the Canon EOS 80D, the image quality is one of its key selling points because it does an exceptional job of producing images whose quality is nothing short of spectacular. Regardless of the shooting mode, light setting and even environmental condition you can be certain that the end result is sharp, vivid and vibrant images with exceptional color reproduction. Similarly, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] delivers high-quality images, however, when compared to those captured by the 80D, the results of the 80D remains unrivaled. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] does a great color reproduction job and also performs surprisingly strongly even in low light settings. At higher ISO ranges, the noise suppression functions quite well.

    Design

    The general design of both the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon 80D[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] is the same as that of other DSLR cameras. When reviewed individually, both cameras have a fairly bulky design with great ergonomics as they fit perfectly into a user’s hand. The arrangement of dials and buttons on the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon 80D[/link] are intuitively placed, making it easy to use the camera when then using the viewfinder. Additionally, the camera’s LCD touchscreen is well articulated and can be tilted in various directions. Pertaining its weight, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V7w72O”]Canon 80D[/link] is a rather heavy camera that weighs 730 grams. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] on the other hand also has buttons that are easily accessible; however, users also get various other options through which they can change the camera’s settings as they work. Unlike with the 80D, its LCD touchscreen cannot be adjusted, and it is fairly larger than the typical LCD screens. Weighing at 765 grams the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] is heavier than the Canon EOS 80D a factor that some photographers may find to be concerning given that it affects the steadiness of the device.

    Performance

    Even though both cameras do a good job as far as their performance is concerned, the Canon EOS 80 D surpasses the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] by a mile. This because it is fitted and powered by a DIGIC 6 processor that ensures the camera focuses really quickly, that the shutter speeds are swift and that the camera is able to achieve a continuous shooting speed of 7 frames per second. Additionally, the live view mode is also distinctly fast; with its autofocus able to incessantly track a subject that is on the move without losing focus. Powered by an Expeed 4 processor, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link] also performs well, just not as good as the EOS 80D. The camera’s processor makes it easy for photographers to navigate the camera effortlessly and that the autofocus and burst rates are good.

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/31H0sIa”]Nikon D7200[/link]’s autofocus system has 51-points, with 15 of those being cross-type sensors which make focusing that much quicker and in comparison, to the 80D’s 43 cross-type sensors, the Nikon 7200D takes home its first crown.

    Conclusion

    Both these cameras have features that photographers would find desirable. However, the final decision really comes down to what works best for the photographer as well as the outcome they are hoping to achieve when they put the camera to use.

  • The 5 Best Cameras for Landscape Photography in 2024

    Introduction

    Are you a photography professional, DIY enthusiast, or a fully-fledged professional business? Do you want an excellent way to capture memories in time, using solutions that will make lasting impressions? Well, introducing the best cameras for landscape photography. For savvy photographers, you will know that aside from evaluating the scene and editing skills, you also need the appropriate equipment. According to a recent study, taking photos can help to relieve acute mental stress.

    That said, the consumer market is packed with different camera brands, which can make it challenging to choose the appropriate one. A good camera for landscaping should be rugged, have a powerful lens, autofocus functions, offer secure storage, and more. Taking good landscape photos is all about being able to engage with your audience, with the right focus on the subject or image. Furthermore, being able to balance factors such as exposure and the performance of the lens is crucial. We considered all these factors and more in choosing these best cameras. They include:

    Pentax K-1 Mark II 36MP

    Pentax K-1 Camera for Lanscape Photography

    For those who are not aware, the Pentax K-1 Mark 11 36 MP Weather resistant camera is a flagship camera in the PENTAX-K Series lineup. Aside from outstanding image quality, this camera offers exceptional sensitivity imaging performances. Furthermore, the improved PRIME IV imaging engine ensures flawless and high-speed operation, as well as excellent noise control. Therefore, you can enjoy enhanced image quality and super high sensitivity imaging performance. The camera also boots up fast and sits comfortably in the hands of the user.

    More importantly, the PENTAX-developed pixel shift resolution comes with unique upgrades. The powerful lens also adjusts to the unique characteristics of the environment such as the light and more. The system lets you capture high sensitivity images in handheld shooting. The camera achieves this goal by detecting the slight adjustments in the position of the subject, particularly during continuous shooting. Other unique features to improve your creativity include the dependable magnesium alloy body and weather-resistant design. An optical viewfinder provides nearly 100 percent field of view for real-time subject confirmation in each scene. Best of all, the camera features a tiltable LCD monitor that can accommodate different shooting positions.

    Pros

    • Has a 36MP filter less and shake reduction sensor
    • Comes with APS-C crop mode that is compatible with many lenses
    • Equipped with an engine accelerometer for reduced noise
    • Features magnesium allow and weather-resistant body

    Cons

    • The exterior of this unit is not fully water-resistant
    • The tiltable LCD is not bright enough during the day

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2Ln5HXR” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”8″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Canon EOS 5DS R

    Canon EOS 5DS R for Landscape Photography

    The Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with low pass filter is also an excellent recommendation for your landscaping needs. It comes with a low pass filter effect cancellation, that takes full advantage of the powerful CMOS sensor. The powerful lens even features automatic scene settings, thereby adjusting to different landscapes or environments. Thus, you can enjoy an exceptional level of high-resolution images with each photography session. Thanks to the durable exterior plastic construction, the camera offers several years of reliable performance. Even more, the EOS scene detection system comes with a 150,000-pixel RGB+IR metering sensor. You can also expect exceptional levels of splash proof benefits from this camera, that makes it ideal for the rugged outdoors. The unique sensor does well to deliver high-quality content that you can enjoy with your audience. The camera also features a 6—point high-density reticular AF, which does well to apply focus on the main subject of the photography. Customizing the performance of this camera is also simple thanks to the simple to use system software.

    Pros

    • Comes with a lower pass filter effect cancellation
    • Equipped with a newly designed 50.6 megapixel CMOS sensor
    • It also has a 61 point high-density reticular AF
    • The camera has an advanced mirror control mechanisms

    Cons

    • The low pass filter effect cancellation is not powerful enough
    • You might have to invest in another bag for convenient storage

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2zTqnzZ” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”8″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Nikon Z7 FX-Format

    Nikon Z7

    This list of best cameras would not have been complete without the Nikon Z7 FX-Format Camera. Designed to be both powerful and straightforward to use at the same time, this unit makes up for an excellent addition to any type of photography session. You can use it out on wet trails, indoors for DIY photos or even for taking professional images. Not only is this unit suitable for capturing the best landscapes, but it also has an appealing finish that speaks volumes about your profession. It comes with a large and revolutionary lens, that will provide reliable performance with each photography session. Furthermore, the powerful 45.8 megapixel is more than powerful to capture your outdoor experiences in exceptional clarity. It also features a backside illuminated image sensor with a no optical low pass filter. Therefore, you can enjoy high-quality images without any blurring or shaking issues. More so, the camera is also capable of recording content in 4K-ultra HD, which makes it ideal for different types of content production. Designed to be compatible with various types of lenses and mounts, this camera is a reliable addition to your regimen.

    Pros

    • Comes with a large Z mount for enhanced optical performance
    • It also has a 45.7MP backside illuminated image sensor
    • The 49.3 point sensor also comes with an autofocus function
    • Compatible with various types of lenses and mounts

    Cons

    • The camera is somewhat heavy for some users
    • Customizing the autofocus in low light is not easy

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/34slKev” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”8″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Fujifilm GFX 50S

    Fujifilm GFX 50S

    Develop some of the best landscape photographs, as though you have done for years with the Fujifilm GFX 50S Camera. With this best landscape photography camera, you are sure of a reliable camera for multiple photo-taking sessions. The camera comes with a powerful CMOS sensor and full-frame sensors. More so, the camera also has an exceptional operating temperature and lightweight body for years of reliable performance. For users who appreciate advanced technology features, the camera also has a 3.96M dot organic EL electronic viewfinder. The inclusion of the touchscreen LCD makes it easy to customize the camera, even in bright conditions. You will appreciate the camera comes with the highly reputable technology of the X series and image technology. Thus, the GFX 50S series provides the best image quality you have experienced in a portable camera. It also comes with a large diameter g mount, that will provide exceptional robustness and durability benefits. Designed to compact and simple on the hands, this camera is perfect for several hours of photography. As a reliable camera for your needs, you can also expect various additional accessories such as strap, eyepiece cup, storage bag and more.

    Pros

    • Comes with a simple to use touchscreen LCD
    • Has a detachable 3.69M Dot organic EL electronic viewfinder
    • Equipped with a large diameter g mount
    • Full frame sensors and X Processor pro for advanced imaging

    Cons

    • The camera lacks accessories for user convenience
    • Installing the large g mount is not easy

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2Lkx1FW” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”8″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Panasonic LUMIX S1R

    Panasonic Lumix S1R Camera for Landscapes

    Make your photography projects much more comfortable with the Panasonic LUMIX S1R Full Frame camera. It comes with a full-frame sensor, with a powerful 47.3 megapixel MOS sensor. The unique sensor provides an exceptional dynamic range and outstanding performance at high sensitivity levels. More so, the camera can also record 4K video, plus produce 6K photo functions. Featuring a 187MP high-resolution mode, you can be sure of fine art photos and landscapes by using a tripod. Furthermore, the camera has a unique RGBW LCD monitor that has a triaxial tilt, with an OLED viewfinder. The Panasonic brand has also done well to position the ports and camera functions conveniently, thereby improving your user experience. Therefore, you can capture high-quality images, regardless of the conditions outdoors. You will also appreciate the free resistant design, that can withstand field use, even under harsh weather conditions. With such a unique combination of unique design features, you can easily rely on this unit for various landscaping proejcts.

    Pros

    • Comes with a full-frame sensor that has a dynamic range
    • Rugged, water-resistant design with freeze withstands heavy field use
    • Has a robust 47.3-megapixel full-frame MOS sensor
    • The LCD monitor is powerful and bright in various conditions

    Cons

    • The camera is not fully waterproof
    • It advanced control technology over the lens is not precise

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2LrCXfp” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”8″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Conclusion

    When it comes to taking your photography career to the next level, owning reliable technology is one of the best ways to get good results. In particular, the best camera for landscape photography lets you take high-quality images, with just a simple click. As a landscape photographer, you want to take pictures, that not only impress the audience but you as well. The best way to start your career is to identify a powerful camera, that speaks volumes about your profession or hobby. More so, these cameras have various automatic settings and robust lenses. Thus, you can customize the cameras to suit specific landscape photography purposes, thereby enhancing your results

    .

  • Canon T6 vs. T6i [Complete Comparison 2019]

    Canon T6 vs. T6i [Complete Comparison 2019]

    Introduction

    The popularity of digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) cameras has Increased over the years with more and more individuals taking up photography. Canon is known to produce some of the best DSLR cameras in the market, including the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″]Canon T6i[/link]. Also referred to as the Canon EOS 1300D and EOS 750D respectively, the Canon Rebel T6 and T6i are among the most popular cameras in the market today. There have been several debates about which of the two cameras is better than the other. And to try and settle this debate we look at what sets them apart as well as which one you should consider purchasing.

    Canon T6 Canon T6i
    Resolution 18 Megapixels 24 Megapixels
    ISO 12800 25600
    Flash Range 9m 12m
    Focus Points 9 19
    Memory Card Support No Yes
    Inbuilt Microphone No Yes
    Smartphone Remote Control No Yes
    Shots per second 2 5
    Weight 485g 555g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”4″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″ background=”#ef2d38″ size=”4″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow” target=”blank”]View Price![/su_button]

    Similarities Between the T6 and T6i

    The similarities in these two cameras are quite obvious; however, for individuals who are unfamiliar with cameras; these two cameras may seem pretty much the same. Some of the similarities between the two cameras include inbuilt wireless, continuous shooting, pentamirror optical viewfinders, and 3-inch screens. Users can also capture videos in high resolutions of 1920 x 1080. The lenses of these two cameras can be used interchangeably so if, by chance a user has a [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] camera but decides to upgrade their camera to the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″]Canon T6i[/link], they can use the lenses of the T6 on the T6i.

    Main Differences Between the T6 and T6i

    Price

    The price of the cameras is probably the biggest difference between them. The T6 is listed at around $400, while the T6i is listed at about $900 (but we see it available, on occasion, for less than $600).

    Touchscreen/Usability

    The T6i has an extremely responsive touchscreen that facilitates the manipulation of the camera’s settings to enable shooting from different angles as opposed to using buttons, as is the case of the T6. It also has improved resolution that gives a photographer an idea of what their pictures would look like before they even capture them. Another notable difference between the two touch screens is that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″]Canon T6i’s[/link] touchscreen is a tilt-flip screen as opposed to the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] one that is fixed to its back.

    Resolution/Megapixels

    The Megapixels of the cameras also vary with the T6i bragging 24 megapixels while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] boasts 18 megapixels. Any photographer worth their salt will inform you that megapixels are an extremely essential part of photography particularly if one wishes to print out physical copies of their images in high definition and the more megapixels, the better your images. According to experts in the field, anything above five megapixels is more than ideal for normal, everyday photography use and the fact that both these cameras have way more than megapixels than the expected five means that they are capable of doing a pretty decent job.

    Weight and Dimension

    Another noticeable difference between the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″]Canon T6i[/link] cameras would be in the weight and dimensions of the cameras. The T6 weighs 485 grams and measures 129 x 101 x 78 mm while the T6i weighs 555 grams and measures 32 x 101 x 78 mm. The fact that the T6 is lighter could be appealing to a select few, but it is not such a significant difference given that a camera’s body isn’t necessarily the only determining factor when it comes to the total weight of the camera. Other things, such as the lens could alter the final weight of the camera immensely.

    Various Features

    The T6 lacks some features such as UHS memory card support, inbuilt microphone, and remote control via a user’s smartphone features that the T6i is equipped with. While these are not features that photographers may require for their daily activities, they are certainly convenient features to have for when the need arises.

    Conclusion

    Conclusively one can say that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″]Canon T6i[/link] is an upgraded version of the T6. This is because a lot of the functional parts of the T6i are improved versions of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link]. Some of those functionalities include quicker continuous shooting at five shots per second as opposed to two, improved focus points of nineteen versus the previous nine, a 12-meter flash range in comparisons to the T6’s nine-meter, and twice the ISO at 12.8. The ISO of the two cameras can be further expanded to 12800 for the T6 and 25600 for the T6i.

    Disadvantages of the Canon Cameras

    Environmental sealing to protect the camera from external factors such as dust, rain, etc. and image stabilization are two important things that both the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD”]Canon T6[/link] and T6i cameras lack. Photographers using these cameras would be limited to using them in normal, steady settings away from shaky surfaces, high temperatures, wet environments, or any other tough condition for that matter. Both cameras are equipped with pentamirror optical viewfinders which are not as good or bright as the pentaprism viewfinders that you can find in other cameras.

    However, despite these few downsides, the Canon cameras are great for sports photography as they have huge lenses and powerful sensors that can effortlessly capture objects in motion.

    Final Thoughts

    Apart from small differences such as the battery life and weight, the T6i takes the crown home. This is because it has better systems and several additional features that the T6 lacks. However, this is not to say that the T6 is not a great camera because it is. Equipped with an 18-55mm kit lens, the Canon T6 is a great camera for individuals who may be limited by their budget.

    Nevertheless, your needs as a user should determine which of the two cameras you should opt for because, for example, if you intend to shoot films/videos, the T6i would be recommended as it offers 60 FPS for video as opposed to the 30 FPS offered by the T6 camera. Both the T6 and T6i cameras are powerful, light, and easy to use cameras and choosing the cameras that suit your needs is a sure way ensure you take some really great shots that will wow many. The two cameras are ideal for, street photography, landscape photography, sports photography, portrait photography, and everyday use.

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2YNiNkD” background=”#ef2d38″ size=”4″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]Check Canon T6 Prices![/su_button]

    [su_spacer]

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/31oyct4″ background=”#ef2d38″ size=”4″ center=”yes” radius=”round” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]Check Canon T6i Prices![/su_button]

    [su_spacer]

  • The 5 Best Cameras for Cinematography and Filmmaking

    The digital revolution has transformed filmmaking, bringing powerful video technology to a wider range of users than ever before. But from budding first-time cinematographers through to mid-sized professional productions, needs and budgets vary considerably: what may qualify as the best camera for cinematography at one one end of the spectrum may not satisfy needs at the other.

    Whether you’re interested in shooting narratives, music videos, documentaries, web series, commercials, vlogs, travelogues – or any other form of filmmaking where the emphasis is on the art of visual storytelling – we’re assuming that you’re looking for the best camera you can afford. In this guide we recommend five different options for those wishing to up their creative filmmaking game. These include:

    Our Categories – Different Options for Different Needs

    Now let’s look at our top picks. We’ve picked the best option for a set of different needs, which include:

    • Overall Best for Cinematography (Moderate Price Points)
    • Best Camera for Professional Cinematography (High Price Point)
    • Best Camera for Cinematography and Photography Combined
    • Best Camera for Cinematic Vlogging
    • Best Entry-Level Camera for Cinematography on a Budget

    Let’s get into it!

    [P_REVIEW post_id=2611 visual=full]

    Overview

    There was a lot of hype and anticipation about the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K[/link] in the run up to its release, and we’re happy to say that the reality has not let filmmakers down. Indeed, the BPCC4 is our choice of overall best camera for cinematography on the market right now.

    Despite sitting in the same price-bracket as many mediocre consumer camcorders, this is a genuine filmmaker’s tool. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]BPCC4[/link] is capable of producing highly cinematic footage of a truly impressive quality, capturing as it does 4096 x 2160 DCI 4K images at rates up to 60 fps – 120 frames in full-HD (although using this latter function means choosing cropped-sensor filming). Despite not having a full-frame sensor, beautiful shallow depth-of-field clips are entirely possible at smaller lens apertures.

    Don’t expect any easy auto modes with the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]BPCC4[/link] though: to get the best out of this camera you’ll really need to know what you are doing (or be willing to learn), as operation is entirely manual. So while it’s not for those who want a camera to do all the work for them, the advantage here is that the user retains full control over the end results.

    Nonetheless, operation is very straightforward and hassle-free, due to an extremely simple and intuitively designed menu system. Operation feels a lot like a DSLR, only with bigger buttons and controls. And although not truly pocket-sized, the camera can easily be handheld if required. It’s also plenty light enough to be placed on a gimbal stabilizer, where it invariably produces quite astounding results.

    On the downside, when compared to today’s Mirrorless and DLSR cameras, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]BPCC4[/link]’s autofocus system is a little disappointing, and lacks true continuous AF, only offering tap AF via the LCD. The other notable let-down is poor battery-life (typically 30 or 40 minutes max shooting time before the battery needs replacing). So if you plan on doing a full day of filming, you’ll need to have multiple batteries permanently on-charge as a back-up.

    These minor gripes aside, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K[/link] is clearly among the very best cameras for cinematography available right now, and with its highly competitive price and relative ease of use it takes our overall number one spot.

    [wpr_button url=”https://amzn.to/2lXRIxM”]

    [P_REVIEW post_id=2610 visual=full]

    Overview

    By far the most “serious” cinematography camera on our list, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/368yyXY”]Canon EOS C200[/link] may seem very expensive compared to the other cameras we look at here. But rest assured that this is the real thing, and is actually relatively cheap when compared to cinema cameras with similar specs.

    Nonetheless, given the initial investment required, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/368yyXY”]C200[/link] will largely appeal to more experienced cinematographers looking to move up from their DSLR or Mirrorless setup to a dedicated cinema camera. True, the C200’s spec is probably not sufficiently heavyweight to satisfy big budget productions who would normally rent Red or Arri equipment. But for indie filmmakers wanting to purchase their own gear, or smaller productions in need of a convincing B-cam, the C200 has little competition.

    The C200 features a beautiful high-res CMOS sensor with advanced Dual Pixel Auto Focus. This performs especially well when set via the touch-sensitive LCD, and the possibility to single-handedly control focus via the camera’s built-in monitor makes this one of the best cinematography cameras for use on a gimbal right now.

    But the feature that will have most filmmakers lusting for this camera is undoubtedly the ability to shoot 4k at 60fps and to record RAW internally, using a newly developed compressed RAW codec that Canon calls Cinema RAW Light. All in all the [link url=”https://amzn.to/368yyXY”]EOS C200[/link] is a very desirable piece of kit that easily qualifies as the best camera for cinematography for those willing and able to make a serious investment.

    [wpr_button url=”https://amzn.to/368yyXY”]

    [P_REVIEW post_id=2612 visual=full]

    Overview

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]Sony a7III[/link] is another camera that generated a lot of excitement prior to its release. And just as with the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4K, the hype around the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]Sony a7III[/link] was entirely justified. Indeed the a/7III has gone on to become an industry standard – both for filmmakers and stills photographers. In fact this is likely the best option out there right now for those looking for a formidable two-in-one video and photography package. And one that comes with a full-frame sensor, no less.

    In addition to its well-endowed 24 megapixel image sensor, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]Sony Alpha 7III[/link] boasts super fast autofocus with facial recognition right across the frame; both a high resolution LCD and an electronic viewfinder; great battery performance; and, most importantly, stunning full-frame 4K video.

    On the downside, while the LCD does at least tilt for easier waist-level operation and monitoring, it is not fully articulating, so you may want to invest in an additional top-mount monitor. Also be aware that Sony’s own lenses tend to be quite expensive so unless you go for third-party options, adding a second lens to your kit may cost just as much as the camera itself.

    [wpr_button url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]

    [P_REVIEW post_id=2614 visual=full]

    Overview

    First the good news: the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oaivaQ”]Nikon D3300[/link] is a very affordable entry-level DSLR capable of producing both stills and video footage of a quality normally associated with cameras costing twice the price – if not more. With that said though, let’s be totally clear that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oaivaQ”]Nikon D3300[/link] would be few people’s first choice for either of these tasks.

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oaivaQ”]D3300’s[/link] sensor is small, its low light performance fairly poor, its overall features and connectivity quite limited, and its video capabilities basic. It’s also quite a few years old now. But at the price, you can do a lot, lot worse. And if you are a new filmmaker moving up from a smartphone or compact camera, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oaivaQ”]D3300[/link] with its interchangeable Nikon lenses and full manual controls will totally transform your output and workflow. Sure, there probably won’t be any D3300 footage screening at your local IMAX theater any time soon, but as a first step on the cinematographic path, you can do a lot worse.

    Note that although the Nikon D3400 has been superseded by the more recent D3400 and D3500 models, for filmmaking we recommended the D3300 over its more recent siblings as the D3400 has only mono microphone capability, and the D3500 no external mic port at all.

    [wpr_button url=”https://amzn.to/2oaivaQ”]

    [P_REVIEW post_id=2616 visual=full]

    Overview

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2nrgHd8″]Panasonic Lumix GH5[/link] is a great little camera for high-quality cinematography on a mid-sized budget. While it’s small and lightweight, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2nrgHd8″]Lumix GH5[/link] shoots 4K video and packs in both an articulating touchscreen and a fantastic high-resolution electronic viewfinder. All of which make it ideal for the lone operator looking for a top-quality option for filmmaking on the move.

    Amazing in-body stabilization means that you can often get away with hand-holding without a gimbal stabilizer. And the inclusion of Panasonic’s Cine-D color profile makes for easy and attractive grading. Build, design, and layout of controls are all excellent, and the GH5’s numerous functions are quickly accessed without the need to dig deep into labyrinthian sub-menus.

    While the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2nrgHd8″]Lumix GH5[/link] is primarily a video camera, it’s also capable of producing some great looking stills. In fact, although not quite as persuasive an option as the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]Sony Alpha 7III[/link] (above), the ability to extract 18 megapixel still images from the GH5’s video footage makes it an appealing option for those in need of both 4K video and high resolution photos of the same source.

    The only major compromise with this camera is the fact that its image sensor is not full-frame;  instead Panasonic have used the considerably smaller Micro Four Thirds format. If you’ll largely be uploading your videos to sites such as YouTube and Vimeo this will not be of major concern. But those interested in making dramatic shorts, documentaries, music videos etc. for screening elsewhere may want to consider some of the better-endowed options we look at here instead. Just bear in mind that moving up to something like the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2oayWUJ”]Sony Alpha 7III[/link] will cost you a significant amount more money.

    Overall though, this is a fantastic little tool for filmmaking that will appeal to vloggers and YouTube filmmakers looking for something portable and affordable, yet capable of producing highly attractive imagery on the go.

    [wpr_button url=”https://amzn.to/2nrgHd8″]

    More Guidance – Choosing the Camera That’s Right for Your Film Making

    The best cameras for cinematography should do the following:

    • Capture high-resolution imagery
    • Offer broad exposure latitude
    • Produce great colors
    • Provide easy monitoring and focusing
    • Have impressive Audio capabilities
    • Include extensive range of video codecs

    Accordingly, these are the main considerations we’ve taken into account when compiling our guide.

    But just as today’s filmmakers come in many forms, so too do today’s cameras. And not all of the best options are necessarily dedicated cinematography cameras. So how do we choose? Let’s take a look at the various options:

    DSLR/Mirrorless vs. Camcorder vs. Cinema Cameras – Which are Best for Cinematography?

    DSLR and Mirrorless

    Although primarily designed for shooting stills photography, the video capabilities of many DSLR and Mirrorless cameras have become extremely impressive in recent years. What’s more, an entry- or prosumer-level DSLR or Mirrorless camera will usually be no more expensive (and often considerably cheaper) than a dedicated camcorder.

    Despite this – and somewhat counterintuitively – video quality on the best Mirrorless or DSLR models will usually be better than on prosumer-level camcorders. What’s more, with a DSLR or Mirrorless camera you will likely also benefit from a greater range of lenses.

    Camcorders

    In fact the only real advantage offered by a camcorder is speed and ease of use. But if you are serious about filmmaking then this consideration is likely to be lower on your list of priorities than the ability to shoot high quality video, with full control over the results. For this reason we recommended skipping the camcorder category altogether, which is much better suited to filming events, corporate videos, or news footage than producing beautifully shot cinematic narratives.

    Cimema Cameras

    High quality cinema cameras are an entirely different matter though. Although cinema cameras share some similarities with the DSLR and Mirrorless systems – most notably the ability to use interchangeable lenses – cinema cameras are dedicated filmmaking tools and, unlike camcorders, are specifically designed with cinematographers in mind.

    This being the case, cinema cameras tend to come without the stills-shooting capabilities that are the primary purpose of DSLRs and Mirrorless cameras, but which are largely just a distraction for those of us who are only interested in cinematography. Of this kind of camera, we recommend two different models here, at vastly differing price points.

    Having said this, those cinematographers who are also interested in shooting stills photography from time to time will also find that they are covered for options in our guide.

    Final Thoughts

    As we’ve seen, the best cameras for cinematography combine the ability to shoot high quality video; record audio via external stereo microphones; quickly and accurately track focusing via a touch screen; and ideally will support a broad range of video formats and codecs. However, precisely which is the best camera for your cinematography will depend on your own specific needs and budget. Whatever your personal requirements though, there’s sure to be a model above that will satisfy all your filmmaking needs. Happy shooting!

  • Canon 80D vs Nikon D7500 – A Complete Comparison

    Introduction

    Both cameras are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that brag superb handling and build. They were introduced to the in February 2016 and April 2017 respectively where they were received with quite the enthusiasm from beginners and mid-level photographers. Today we compare the two cameras to see how they differ from each other and which one of them is the better camera.

    Overview – At a Glance

    Canon 80d Nikon d7500
    Resolution: 24.20 Megapixels 20.90 Megapixels
    Sensor size: (22.5mm x 15.0mm) (23.5mm x 15.7mm)
    Viewfinder: Optical / LCD Optical / LCD
    Kit Lens: 7.50x zoom 5.00x zoom
    Dimensions: 5.5 x 4.1 x 3.1 in. 5.3 x 4.1 x 2.9 in.
    Shutter: 1/8000 – 30 sec 1/8000 – 30 sec
    Max Aperture: 3.5 (kit lens) 2.8 (kit lens)
    Weight: 1.27 kg 1.197 kgs
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Overview

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link] is a camera that performs exceptionally well in comparison to other cameras within its range. Its performance can be attributed to its APS-C CMOS sensor, which has an effective maximum resolution of 24.2 megapixels. With a 1.6x crop factor, the 80D captures brilliant JPEG and RAW images with a 14-bit depth. Its dimension and weight are 5.5” x 4.1 x 3.1″ and 730 grams. The EOS 80D is ideal for photographers who have previously used Canon cameras because then they can reuse their accessories, photographers who are price conscious and are limited by their budget as well as individuals who prefer having anti-aliasing in a bid to prevent moire.

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] is in our opinion one of the most usable DSLR cameras we have come across. Like its counterpart the 80D, it is fitted with an APS-C CMOS sensor that has an effective maximum resolution of 20.9-megapixel. It captures vibrant ad vivid images whose color rendition is just stunning. Powered by an Expeed 5 processor, this camera pleasantly surprised us as we did not expect the performance it delivered. The dimension and weight of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] are 5.5 x 4.1 x 3.1″ and 640 grams which make it slightly smaller and lighter than the Canon EOS 80D. You should consider the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] if you are a photographer who prefers a wider ISO range, do not want the anti-aliasing filter, frequently needs to capture 4K videos and are not budget conscious.

    Canon 80D vs Nikon D7500 – Differences

    The year when these two cameras were launched is not the only thing that sets them apart. There are a few other key features and specs that differentiate the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link]. Some of these features include;

    The Anti-aliasing filter

    Unlike the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link], the EOS 80D has an anti-aliasing filter (AAF) which restricts its ability to capture exceptionally detailed images as they tend to become slightly blurred. The significant difference between the images captured by the cameras is rather stark since the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] yields shots that are way sharper.

    Image Sensor size

    Even though the cameras possess the same APS-C sensor, the size of Canon’s sensor is relatively smaller than that of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] which is 9% bigger and measures 369 mm².

    Video recording capabilities

    The Canon EOS 80D, which is the older of the two cameras is incapable of capturing 4K quality videos and is limited to full HD 1080p videos at 60 frames per second. By contrast the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] captures the 4K quality video at 30 frames per second. However, the cameras autofocus systems are quite distinct as the D7500 uses a contrast autofocus system while the 80D uses Canon’s innovative dual pixel CMOS autofocus system which drastically outperforms the other.

    Resolution

    The maximum resolution on the cameras varies with the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link] possessing a 24.2-megapixel resolution in comparison to the 20.9-megapixel possessed by the D7500. The difference in maximum resolution does not translate similarly to the pixel pitch because the D7500 has a larger pixel pitch outpacing the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link] by 12%.

    LCD Screen

    Even though both cameras have touchscreen capabilities, the display screens operate differently with the D7500 tilting while that of the 80D swivels. The touchscreen of the 80D which is obviously well articulated therefore offers more flexibility during shooting.

    ISO range

    [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link]’s ISO range is limited to 100 -16000, unlike the D7500 which has a much wider range of 100 -51,200.
    Connectivity options: The [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] has Bluetooth capabilities which the EOS 80D lacks. However, both devices have Wi-Fi as a connectivity option.

    Canon 80D vs Nikon D7500 – Similarities

    Similarly, as there are differences, there are also a few similarities shared between the DSLR cameras. They include;

    Touchscreen display

    Even though the displays of the cameras function completely differently from each other, they are both touch enabled, which helps with the maneuverability of the cameras.

    Optical viewfinder

    The optical viewfinders on the [link url=”https://amzn.to/31FOv5j”]Canon 80D[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] are both high-quality pentaprism viewfinders that offer 100% coverage for framing scenes. The viewfinder magnification of the cameras is also more or less the same and they have a somewhat equal diopter adjustment.

    Lens disposability

    Both the 80D and D7500 have copious interchangeable lenses available at their disposable which means photographers have lots of options that they can choose from. Any Canon or third-party EF or EF-S mount lenses can be used with the Canon EOS 80D while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link] is capable of functioning with any AF-S DX and AF-S lenses that are Nikkor or otherwise.

    Flash

    There is a nifty pop-up flash feature on both the cameras that comes in handy, especially in settings with poor lighting.

    Which One Should You Opt for?

    For novices, enthusiasts and intermediate photographers, these two cameras make for some pretty strong contenders when deciding which one to opt for. And while the final decision rests with the photographer as they are more in touch with their needs and budget, we would opt for the [link url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv”]Nikon D7500[/link].

    The reason being that it performs much better and has a debatably better image sensor that offers photographers an improved dynamic range as well as color reproduction that is extremely vivid. Additionally, you can also shoot high-resolution videos with exceptional quality.

    But this does not mean that the Canon EOS 80D does a terrible job, no! On the contrary it is a pretty decent device and its dual pixel CMOS autofocus system places it ahead of the pack when shooting HD videos. It is also the more affordable camera of the two.

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/34YvzRv” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Nikon D7500![/su_button]

  • Canon M50 vs Sony a6300 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    Introduction

    Both Canon and Sony have been at the technological forefront, constantly and tirelessly working to come up with innovative cameras that consumers can use to capture timeless memories. In this article we compare the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] models, which are two similar yet dissimilar cameras that form part of the brands’ product portfolio.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon m50 Sony a6300
    Resolution: 24.20 Megapixels 24.20 Megapixels
    Sensor size: (22.3mm x 14.9mm) (23.5mm x 15.6mm)
    Kit Lens: 3.00x zoom 3.13x zoom
    Viewfinder: EVF / LCD EVF / LCD
    Shutter: 1/4000 – 30 sec 1/4000 – 30 sec
    Max Aperture: 3.5 (kit lens) 3.5 (kit lens)
    Dimensions: 4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in. 4.7 x 2.6 x 1.9 in.
    Weight: 484 g 520 g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6300 – Specifications

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] is a mirrorless interchangeable lens digital camera that uses an EF-M lens mount and was first introduced into the market in 2018. This DSLR style mirrorless camera is the crown jewel of Canon’s M-series cameras and with good reason. This camera which runs on a DIGIC 8 Image Processor has a 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor that facilitates the capturing of images that have a spectacular dynamic range, incredible color with clear details.

    It brags a wide ISO range of between 100 to 25600 and continuous shooting speeds of 10 frames per second which is perfect for capturing subjects that are on the move. With an inbuilt electronic viewfinder that has a high resolution of approximately 2360K dots, when shooting, the amount of detail will pleasantly surprise photographers. Other additional features that the EOS M50 brags include inbuilt Wi-Fi and a well-articulated vari-angle touchscreen that’s useful when you need to capture shots from weird angles. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] weighs 387 grams with dimensions of 4.6″ x 3.5″ x 2.3″.

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link], on the other hand, is a slightly older interchangeable lens camera that was introduced to consumers in February 2016 and makes use of an E mount for functionality. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] brags a range finder style body which is a big contrast from the M50. Just like the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] is fitted with an APS-C Exmor CMOS sensor and is operated by a BIONZ X image processor. The Sensor which minimizes noise and expands sensitivity brags 24.3 megapixels that provide users with brilliant-quality images. Its ISO range falls between 100 to 25600 just like the M50; however, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link]’s ISO is expandable to 51200. It manages speeds of 11 frames per second in continuous shooting with 425 phase detection autofocus points.

    Similarly, it has a well-articulated 3″ monitor and a high-resolution XGA OLED electronic viewfinder that enhances viewing for photographers.

    Additionally, it also has inbuilt Wi-Fi, NFC and QR capabilities which simplify the file transfer process. With a weight of 361 grams, it has dimensions of4.7″ x 2.6″ x 1.9″. One noteworthy thing about the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] is that its autofocus system is a hybrid system that uses both contrast and phase detection.

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6300 – Performance

    As previously mentioned, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] are two cameras that are quite similar and dissimilar. Based on their press release statements, the cameras were intended for two very divergent markets; however, they both perform exceptionally well at fulfilling their jobs. For example, both cameras shoot 4K videos and RAW videos.

    Despite being similar, we felt that the backside illuminated [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] performs slightly better than the EOS M50. An example of this would be with the focal length multiplier where the canon only manages 1.5x while the Sony manages more at 1.6x. Similarly, even though they have the same type of sensor, the M50 has a smaller sensor area which reduces the quality and dynamic range of the images captured as well as increases the camera’s noise levels. When everything is taken into account below are the reasons why each of the cameras is better than the other.

    Advantages of Canon EOS M50

    • The M50 is slightly lighter than the a6300, and while this difference may seem small, it could be the determinant of the image quality you produce.
    • When you are capturing videos, the camera uses phase detection autofocus which is much faster and can keep up with the movement of objects in motion without compromising on quality.
    • The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] has a time-lapse function.
    • Reviewing images is much easier as the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link]’s screen has a resolution that is 118.4K dots higher than that of the A6300.
    • The LCD monitor is a touchscreen that can be used for focusing the camera.
    • [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] is extremely versatile and offers many functionalities, including slow motion video recording.

    Advantages of Sony a6300

    • It has a backside illuminated senor which the M50 lacks. The BSI sensor provides image quality and sharpness that is generally much better as its pixels are 1.25 % more than those of the M50.
    • The camera’s sensor is 10.33% larger than that of the M50 and therefor yields images with better quality.
    • The focus points in the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] are copious, which means photographers have flexibility when deciding on what to focus on.
    • When shooting JPEG format at the highest resolution, the AF is 10% faster as the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] only manages 10 frames per second in comparison to the a6300 11 frames per second.
    • It has a better battery life that captures 165 additional shots after the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2V8DEib”]Canon M50[/link] is out of charge.
    • The camera has an internal focus motor that helps in image stabilization when photographers use different lenses that don’t have their own focus motors.
    • It is compatible with a lot more lenses than the M50

    The Bottom Line

    After comparing the two cameras using various specifications, features as well as their performance levels, we would recommend opting for the older [link url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ”]Sony a6300[/link] simply because it shone brighter in more categories than the Canon EOS M50. If you’re looking for the very best as far as image quality goes, the a6300 does a great job, but if you want a camera that is easy to use but still gets the job done, by all means, go for the EOS M50. Nevertheless, we would advise you to make your decision based on which camera you feel serves you best. Only you as the user can be able to gauge and weigh the cameras based on your preference.

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/30fkDjJ” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”8″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Sony a6300![/su_button]

     

  • Canon M50 Vs Sony A6500 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    Introduction

    In February 2018 and October 2016, Canon and Sony announced that they would be introducing/ launching the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] into the market. Both these cameras are mirrorless cameras whose lenses are interchangeable. In this article we compare different elements of the cameras to give you a better understanding of how different or similar they are from each other and if you are thinking of buying one or the other, which one you should consider purchasing.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon m50 Sony a6500
    Resolution: 24.20 Megapixels 24.20 Megapixels
    Sensor size: (22.3mm x 14.9mm) (23.5mm x 15.6mm)
    Viewfinder: EVF / LCD EVF / LCD
    Kit Lens: 3.00x zoom n/a
    Shutter: 1/4000 – 30 sec 1/4000 – 30 sec
    Dimensions: 4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in. 4.7 x 2.6 x 2.1 in.
    Weight: 484 g 453 g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6500 – Sensor Comparison

    Both the Canon EOS M50 and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] have an APS-C CMOS sensor that delivers 24 megapixels when it is put to work. However, despite the sensor being the same, a deeper look into the dynamics of the sensors reveal that there are a few notable variations between the sensors in the two cameras. For starters, the sensors have a slight difference in their size as the sensor area of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link], which measures 332 mm² is 11% smaller than that of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] which measure 367 mm². This variation albeit small consequently translates to varying form factors. The form factor of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] are 1.6x and 1.5x in that order. Both cameras have a 3:2 sensor width to height ratio also known as the native aspect ratio. The larger sensor of the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] provides photographers with better control of the field of depth as well as blurry backgrounds, unlike the M50 which might be a tad difficult to manage when they are sued in the same aperture and focal length.

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6500 – Body and Physical Attributes Comparison

    Weight and size greatly influence a photographer’s decision when they are choosing a camera because nobody wants a camera whose weight or size will hinder them from doing their job appropriately. These two cameras are completely different in their physical build as [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] has dimensions of 116 x 88 x 59 mm while the a6500’s dimensions are 120 x 67 x 53 mm. From the dimensions mentioned you will notice that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] is 21mm taller and 6mm thicker while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] is 4mm thinner. This makes the a6500 conspicuously smaller than the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link], but its small size should not fool you as it markedly heavier weighing at 543 grams in comparison to the M50’s 390 grams. This remarkable difference in weight can probably be attributed to the fact that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] features an environmental sealing that makes it water and dustproof. Finally, both the cameras have 3-inch LCD screens included as part of their body, and they’re available in black and white for the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] and just black for the a6500.

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6500 – Electronic View Finder (EVF)

    The two cameras both have electronic viewfinders built into them. The electronic viewfinders in the cameras have similar measurements (0.39-inches) and a resolution of 2.36 megapixels. However, the EVF features different magnification levels of 0.60x and 0.70x correspondingly. The viewfinders on both cameras offer 100% viewfinder coverage and have diopter adjustment capabilities. As far as the EVF is concerned, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] has an advantage.

    Which One Should You Opt for?

    Each of the cameras has its set of strengths and weaknesses that are unique to it. Below we look at the various strengths of the cameras so you can draw your conclusions depending on the one that you feel carries the day for you.

    Strengths Of the Canon EOS M50

    • A lot has been said all over the internet about this camera. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] excels in the following areas;
    • Its LCD screen is has a better resolution of 1040K dots in comparison to 922K dots which means it is more detailed. In the same breath, the LCD screen also has more flexibility as it swivels in various directions and facilitates shooting imagery at odd angles in either landscape or portrait orientation
    • The fact that the screen is well-articulated means that individuals can also use the M50 for selfies as they can turn the screen to face the front.
    • The M50 is 63 grams lighter than the a6500, which makes it more portable and easier to carry while on the go.
    • The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link] has Bluetooth as a connectivity option which means you can effortlessly share your images without needing any cables.
    • It is relatively cheaper and modern, given that it was introduced 16 months after the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link].

    Strengths of the Sony a6500

    • The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2OfRAoW”]Sony a6500[/link] has better video capabilities as it can capture 4K quality video at 30 frames per second in comparison to the M50’s 24 frames per second.
    • It allows for totally silent shooting thanks to its electronic shutter option.
    • Even though its weights much more than the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30hmLHO”]Canon M50[/link], its body is more compact and therefore smaller which means it can easily fit into your bags.
    • A single battery charge will get you more shots (350 shots versus 250 shots).
    • The camera does not need a power outlet as it can be charged through its USB port. This makes the camera ideal for traveling and for photographers who are constantly on the move.
    • With the a6500 worrying about weather conditions is a thing of the past since the camera is weather sealed, making it splash and dustproof.
    • It has inbuilt image stabilization that reduces handshake impact by ensuring the sensor does not shift unnecessarily. This means that your images will be much sharper.
    • Because the camera was launched much earlier than the M50, you are likely to find it being heavily discounted.

    Final Thoughts

    Unfortunately, we were unable to make a final decision on which camera was better than the other because their strengths and weaknesses balanced each other out in the different elements. However, we hope that the comparison has helped you make your decision concerning which camera is better suited for your budget and your needs. Only you can place the appropriate weight on the different features depending on what it is that you are trying to accomplish.

  • Canon M50 vs Sony a6000 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon EOS M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] are mirrorless digital cameras by two different brands that were announced four years apart in February 2018 and February 2014 respectively. Both the cameras are interchangeable lens cameras fitted with a 24-megapixel APS-C sensor. There have been a lot of debates surrounding the two cameras with individuals comparing the camera’s feature set and characteristics to try and determine what sets them apart. We compare the cameras body size, image sensors, shooting capabilities and features, amongst other things to try and find out which between the two is a better camera.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon m50 Sony a6000
    Sensor size: (22.3mm x 14.9mm) (23.5mm x 15.6mm)
    Resolution: 24.20 Megapixels 24.30 Megapixels
    Max Aperture: 3.5 (kit lens) 3.5 (kit lens)
    Kit Lens: 3.00x zoom 3.13x zoom
    Viewfinder: EVF / LCD EVF / LCD
    Shutter: 1/4000 – 30 sec 1/4000 – 30 sec
    Dimensions: 4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in. 4.7 x 2.6 x 1.8 in.
    Weight: 484 g 468 g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Prices![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Canon M50 vs Sony A6000 – Physical Body Attributes

    To start us off, we conducted a research into the different colors that the cameras were available in and discovered that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon EOS M50[/link] was available in black and white while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] was available in three colors namely silver, white and black which gave users more variety to choose from that would suit their aesthetic appeal.

    The weight and physical sizes of the cameras also varied. The Canon M50 weighed 390 grams in comparison to the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link]’s 344 grams. The dimensions of the camera were as follows 116 x 88 x 59 mm and 120 x 67 x 45 mm for the Canon and Sony cameras respectively. Albeit having small differences as far as the weight and physical size was concerned, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] was notably smaller and lighter than the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon M50[/link], and before anyone thinks that it may not have been a fair judgment, both cameras are not weather sealed.

    In this section we also considered the camera’s battery life because the battery plays a significant role in influencing various attributes pertaining to the physical body. Nevertheless, while there was no notable difference as a result of the batteries, it is important to note that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] uses an NP-FW50 battery captures 360 shots on single charge while the EOS M50 uses an LP-E12 battery that captures 235 shots on single charge. You can charge the NP-FW50 powerpack via USB which makes it ideal for individuals on the move.

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6000 – Image Sensor

    Anyone who has been using cameras for a while now knows that a camera’s image sensor is its soul and a crucial contributing factor of the image output. If a camera is fitted with a large sensor that means its individual pixels are much large and this will improve the camera’s sensitivity in low light settings, better the dynamic range and produce a richer color depth in comparison to cameras with small sensors.

    Both these cameras have large APS-C sensors however the sensors differ all so slightly. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] has a sensor area that is 11% larger than that of the M50, which results in the cameras having different crop/form factors. The Sony a600 has a 1.5x crop factor while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon M50[/link] has a 1.6x crop factor.

    The cameras do however share a 3:2 native aspect ratio. Despite the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] having a slightly larger sensor, the cameras share a 24-megapixel resolution implying that the Sony camera has bigger individual pixels and a smaller pixel density and as such it benefits in terms of its capacity to gather light.

    Nevertheless, this does not in any way discount the capabilities of the M50 which is the newer and technologically advanced camera of two. The native sensitivity range of a camera is also influenced by its sensor, and both these cameras have the exact ISO range of between 100 and 25600, with the ISO range on the EOS M50 being expandable to ISO 100-51200.

    One noteworthy fete that both these cameras are capable of thanks to their sensors, would be their ability to capture both stills and videos. The 24-megapixel APS-C sensor that the cameras are equipped with, has fast read-out times that is adequate for moving imagery. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon EOS M50[/link] stands out here because it can capture 4K quality videos at 25 frames per second while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] only manages a 1080p video quality at 60 frames per second.

    Canon M50 vs Sony a6000 Feature Set

    Besides the physical attributes and sensor, cameras typically have several other features that they are fitted with. One such feature is the electronic viewfinder (EVF) which both cameras are equipped with. The EVF of the cameras varies as the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link]’s EVF has a significantly lower resolution (1440k dots) in comparison to the EOS M50 whose EVF resolution is 2360k dots. Other features that are similar include inbuilt flash, a 3-inch LCD screen, a mechanical shutter speed of 1/4000s, and the lack of in-body stabilization.

    The distinguishing feature of the cameras is the LCD screen in the camera, which is a conventional panel that tilts in the a6000 and a touchscreen that swivels in the M50. The touchscreen element of the screen is helpful when trying to operate the camera and for example set the focus zone you would like to capture. The second differentiating feature pertains to the connectivity options where the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] does not have Bluetooth capabilities and a microphone port which are available on the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon M50[/link]. Considering connectivity options, both cameras have a Hot shoe Port, internal speaker, HDMI port, USB 2.0, Wi-fi and NFC support which work cohesively to ensure that the camera effectively communicates with the surroundings in which it is being used.

    Final Thoughts

    There are several other factors that can be used to compare the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon EOS M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2NrmLOq”]Sony a6000[/link] that we have not discussed above. However, you can effortlessly decide based on the three elements as each camera has its set of strengths and weaknesses. A review of the camera’s different strengths and weakness discussed above point towards the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30dWDwF”]Canon M50[/link] being the camera that takes home the win, but the relative significance placed on the various features is entirely dependent on an individual’s needs and preferences. As such only you can apply the equivalent weights to the specific features you feel are more sensible to you before making your final decision.

  • Canon M50 vs M100 – A Complete Comparison [2020]

    Introduction

    The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ”]Canon EOS M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]Canon EOS M100[/link] are mirrorless cameras that were introduced into the market in February 2018 and August 2017 respectively. The cameras which were touted as entry-level are often compared quite a bit but is there really any significant difference given that they were introduced into the market within months of each other. Users often rank the Canon EOS M50 between the M100 and the M6 which is considered to be a mid-range camera because it has a bunch of features such as 4K video quality that putt it a few steps ahead of even the M-series crown jewel the M5. Nevertheless, we shall deep dive into a few of the different aspects of both cameras to see if we can help quell the wonder that often plagues individuals as they decide on which of the two is the better camera.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon m50 Canon m100
    Image Sensor size 24.1 megapixels 24.2 megapixels
    Continuous Shooting Speeds 10.0 fps 6.1 fps
    Angle Adjustment Vari-angle tilt up 180°
    LCD Monitor size 3.0-type 3.0-type
    Pixels 1.04 million dots 1.04 million dots
    AF Points 143/99 points^ 49 points
    External Microphone Jack Yes Yes
    Touch Panel Yes Yes
    Dimensions 4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in. 4.3 x 2.6 x 1.4 in.
    Weight 387g 302g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Price![/su_button]

    Similarities Between the Canon EOS M50 and EOS M100

    Before comparing the different specs of the cameras, it is important that you are aware of the commonalities between them. For starters, both cameras have a 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS Sensor, and as such you cannot use the resolution and sensor size during your decision-making process. When used at the same aperture and focal length, both sensors provide users with an equal control over the depth of field. Additionally, both cameras have Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC connectivity as well as a dual pixel autofocus system.

    Differences Between the Canon EOS M50 And EOS M100

    Image processor

    This is the first significant difference that you will notice between these two cameras. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ”]Canon M50[/link] is equipped with a DIGIC 8 image processor which is the latest image processor by Canon while the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]Canon M100[/link] has a DIGIC 7 image processor. This difference in the types of processors means that the functionalities of the M50 are significantly better than those of the M100. For example, aside from the 4K video capability, you will notice that when shooting in S-AF, the burst speeds are much faster at 10 frames per second or at 7.4 frames per second when capturing in Servo AF. Additionally, the eye detection in S-AF is also much improved thanks to the processor. A peek into the workings of the M100, and you will notice that the burst speeds discussed earlier are much slower at 6.1fps and 4fps respectively and that it does not have eye detection capabilities.

    RAW formats

    Despite both cameras having inbuilt RAW converters, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ”]Canon M50[/link] uses the CR3 14-bit RAW format which other canon cameras including the M100 do not use. This new RAW format minimizes file sizes by roughly 30-40% without compromising on the resolution that the images had been captured in. This, therefore, means that users can store more files onto their SD card.

    Battery life

    This is one area where the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]Canon M100[/link] shines as it has a better battery life than the M50 despite the fact that they both use the same battery (LP-E12). The Canon M5 is only capable of capturing only 235 shots on a single charge. By contrast, the M100, can capture up to 295 shots before it needs recharging; however, it is important that you remember that the images captured by the cameras depend on the intensity through which the cameras are used. The M100 and the M50 also vary in how the Sd card slot is set up. In the M100 is has a separate slot for the SD card while in the M50 both the card and battery are housed within the same compartment.

    Autofocus system

    Before you get confused, yes, we had previously mentioned that both the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ”]Canon EOS M50[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]EOS M100[/link] had the same autofocus systems and while this remains true, they have a variance in the number of AF points that they each possess. Covering 80% of the sensor’s width and height the M100 brags 49 AF points while the M50 brags autofocus points that range between 99 and 143 depending on the type of lens in use. For example, attaching a 28mm macro, gives you access to the entire 143 points while using a mounted 15-45mm kit lens, only 99 AF points can be achieved. Nevertheless, you can choose one AF point zone when using either of the cameras.

    Video capabilities

    4K video capability was one of the most anticipated features for Canon cameras, and the EOS M50 was the first Canon mirrorless camera to be equipped with the said feature in addition to Full HD (1080p) and HD (720p). The M50 can capture 4K videos at 25 fps, 60 fps for full HD vides and 120 fps for HD videos. The inclusion of the increased 4K resolution means that users can now capture time-lapses in 4K as well as grab stills from videos in the same quality. The M100, on the other hand, does not have 4K capabilities and can only manage 6 fps for full HD videos.

    When considering video capabilities of both cameras, it is important that you remember that Canon’s Dual Pixel autofocus system is limited when using 4K videos where it switches to using a contrast detection based system rather than both the phase detection points and contrast detection system that it uses for videos whose quality is lower than 4K. The contrast detection-based system is not only slow, but it is also somewhat unreliable.

    Price

    We had o touch on cost as the last difference. In our opinion, both cameras are relatively affordable, and after touting them as “entry-level” cameras we would have been surprised if canon had priced them any higher than their current price. With that being said, the EOS M100 is the cheaper of the two cameras, and individuals who are extremely price conscious can settle for it.

    The Bottom Line

    Both the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ”]Canon M50[/link] and [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]Canon M100[/link] are well-rounded cameras that deliver a decent performance, especially for their level. Nevertheless, if we had to choose one, we would go with the Canon EOS M50 which after several test runs, we felt delivered more value than the [link url=”https://amzn.to/30jIuyY”]Canon M100[/link].

    [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2Nr0gsZ” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”8″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Canon M50![/su_button]

  • Canon M50 vs. M6 – A Complete Comparison

    Introduction

    Canon is one of the most revered manufacturers of imaging and optical goods, and it is with good reason. The Japanese multinational has been able to produce products that can be purchased at different levels of the price spectrum depending on a user’s purchasing power. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg”]Canon M50[/link] and the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2LI2YZ7″]Canon M6[/link] are good examples of such products. If we were to rate them based on the company’s press statement, they would be categorized as entry-level and mid-range cameras, respectively. If you’re reading this article, you’ve probably considered purchasing one over the other, and you may be wondering what sets them apart. In this article, we analyze the specifications of the two cameras to help you come to an insightful conclusion.

    Comparison – At a Glance

    Canon m50 Canon m6
    Image Sensor size 24.1 megapixels 24.2 megapixels
    Continuous Shooting Speeds 10.0 fps 9.0 fps
    LCD Monitor size 3.0-type 3.0-type
    Pixels 1.04 million dots 1.04 million dots
    Angle Adjustment Vari-angle tilt up 180° and down 45°
    Dimensions 4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in. 4.4 x 2.7 x 1.8 in
    External Microphone Jack Yes Yes
    AF Points 143/99 points^ 49 points
    Touch Panel Yes Yes
    Weight 387g 390g
    Price [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg” target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Prices![/su_button] [su_button url=”https://amzn.to/2LI2YZ7″ target=”blank” background=”#ef2d35″ size=”6″ center=”yes” onclick=”trackOutboundLink(‘amazon’); clicky.goal( ‘119507’, null, 1 ); clicky.pause( 500 );” rel=”nofollow”]View Prices![/su_button]

    Canon M50 vs. M6 – Design

    We first looked at the physical appearance of the cameras as aesthetics typically contribute to an individual’s final decision. These two cameras have pretty much the same design with several noteworthy differences. The first one being that the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg”]Canon M50[/link] is slightly larger but a couple of milligrams lighter than the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2LI2YZ7″]Canon M6[/link]. The dimensions of the two cameras are 116.3 x 88.1 x 58.7mm and 112 x 68 x 44.5 mm for the Canon M50 and M6 respectively. Secondly, the dials and buttons of the two cameras are slightly different. The M50 has less advanced shooting dials in comparison to the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2LI2YZ7″]Canon M6[/link] whose dials include one for exposure compensation and two more for custom modes. The On/Off switches of the cameras are also positioned differently. The video recording button on the M6 is positioned at the rear of the camera rather than the top. Overall, the M50 has four fewer function buttons. Lastly, the Canon EOS M50 has an overly pronounced grip, unlike its counterpart.

    Canon M50 vs. M6 – Capabilities

    One of the main similarities between the two cameras is that they both have an APS-C 332.3mm 24.0 MP resolution sensors. Since the sensor size is the same, the cameras will have the same resolution. Which translates to users having similar control levels when shooting at the same aperture and focal length as far as depth of the field is concerned. You, however, notice a difference in the capabilities of the cameras when shooting videos. This is because the Canon M50 can shoot 4K video at 24 frames per second while the M6 can only manage full HD quality videos and below. The M50 is also capable of shooting slow-motion videos which is a fete that cannot be said for the M6. Despite its capabilities, the M50 regrettably does not use its sensor’s entire width and creates a 1.6x crop in its imagery.

    Additionally, its autofocus only functions with contrast detection

    The second significant and noticeable difference when comparing the camera’s capability is the ISO range. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg”]Canon M50[/link] has a higher ISO range that can be easily extended, unlike the M6 whose ISO range is limited. This difference in ISO range sensitivity means that the M50 functions better and has more flexibility, especially when it is being used in low light situations.

    Canon M50 vs. M6 Autofocus

    Canon has an innovative Dual Pixel CMOS autofocus which is used in both the M50 and the M6. However, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg”]Canon M50[/link] brags 94 more focus points than the M6, which means more focus area. The M50 has 99 native autofocus points which can be expanded to 143 points with some select camera lenses such as the 55-200mm, 150mm, and 28mm macro. On the other hand, the M6 only has 49 native autofocus points which cover only 80% of its sensor. The [link url=”https://amzn.to/2Nrg7bg”]Canon M50[/link], which is the newer of the two cameras, has the “Eye AF (autofocus)” mode that can be used only with S-AF lenses.

    Similarities between the Canon M50 and M6

    • Even with all the differences discussed above, these two cameras have several similarities and strengths. The similarities include;
    • Similar connectivity options as they both utilize NFC, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.
    • An articulated LCD screen of 1.040k dots resolution that facilitates the ability for users to shoot in different positions.
    • They both have inbuilt flash capabilities and an external flash shoe which aids in settings with low light and in improving flash photography.
    • During continuous shooting, both cameras have relatively fast shooting speeds of 9 and 10 frames per second, respectively.
    • Both cameras support capturing of RAW imagery for stills which means that the image quality is much better than it would typically be.
    • Both cameras had focus peaking capabilities which means they highlighted the subject that they were focused on.

    Downsides of the Canon M50 and M6

    Before deciding on your camera of choice, there are some disadvantages that we felt needed highlighting so users could be fully aware of them. Just like the cameras had some notable similarities, we noted several similar disadvantages between them.
    The first one being that both cameras lacked in-body stabilization which means that users would experience camera shakes when shooting at slower shutter speeds.

    Secondly, the cameras were not adequately sealed for shooting in harsh weather conditions. Finally, the cameras had only one card slot, which meant that users did not have as much storage flexibility as they would with cameras that had two card slots.

    Final Thoughts

    These two cameras have the same base retail price, which of course increases depending on the lens that an individual decided to choose. Depending on the lens, the M50 will likely cost more than the older M6. However, even with the additional lens cost driving up the M50’s price, I would personally opt for it as it has several advantages and feature sets that the M6 lacks. From more autofocus points to a better viewfinder, I do not need to explain why I find myself leaning in the direction of the M50. But if you are a user who may have budgetary limitations, the [link url=”https://amzn.to/2LI2YZ7″]Canon M6[/link] will serve the purpose. It is not a shabby device, and it will still get the job done despite the notable advantages that the M50 may have over it.